Poverty
Nothing in my childhood presaged the fact that I would spend almost ten years in poverty. I was raised in a middle class home, and both my parents worked. I attended a private college preparatory high school where my mother was an English teacher. Going to college was never a question. I graduated with a BA in Early Childhood Education. I was privileged in many ways that I didn’t understand until much later in my life. The details of how I ended up in a family of five living on less than $20,000 a year are complicated and tedious. Suffice it to say that some things were within my control and some things were out of my control. I was too young when I got married–too stubborn in some ways and too malleable in others. I knew nothing about my husband’s alcoholism and my inability to control it. I willingly entered into a difficult situation, and then I got stuck.
So I found myself at twenty-eight years old, pregnant for the second time, with a three-year-old daughter and nine-year-old step-daughter. My husband had just applied for public assistance, which meant I could not work much. The income qualifications were outrageous–I could have worked full time at a retail job and earned too much to qualify for assistance and not enough to pay all our bills. I cared for a friend’s child several days a week for a little cash. We received $600 a month for rent and bills and around $200 a month in food stamps. I remember one cold November day, standing in my darkly lit bedroom staring at myself in the blurry mirror on top of my dresser and wondering, “How is this my life?”
These were some of the darkest years of my life. We had barely enough to eat, and our diet revolved around what was affordable–foods like pasta, cheap spaghetti sauce, and the milk, cheese, and peanut butter our WIC checks provided for us. The local food pantry delivered a box of food for Thanksgiving. And once I went to our local grocery store to ask for a free bag of food. We were down to ketchup and mustard at home, and our next food stamp allotment was a week away. I still feel a pain in my chest when I think about standing at the customer service desk waiting for the clerk to bring me my bag–the employees were people I knew well from my years of shopping there. What did they think of me? No customers or employees ever commented on my food stamps or WIC checks, but I felt shame using them nonetheless. “This is not how I was raised,” I thought every time I bought groceries.
The shame was not limited to my shopping trips. I also felt ashamed of my house. We lived in a small cottage next door to my husband’s parents. I think it was around 800 square feet total. The kitchen/dining room had a concrete slab floor which was cold in the winter and slippery with condensation in the summer. When my daughter was born, it was the main room of our house. She learned to sit up, to crawl, and to walk on the rugs we put over the concrete, but the rugs couldn’t prevent the horrible “thump” that her head made when she tipped over or slipped. I hesitated to bring my few mommy-friends over because I didn’t want their babies to tip over and thump their heads.
For many years, there were only three walls in the bedroom my husband and I used. The fourth wall was simply a curtain pulled between the bedroom and the adjoining space– hardly big enough to be called a separate room. Our bedroom sat over the earthen basement, accessed through a bulkhead outside the house. The damp, mildewy smell of the basement seeped into all our clothes, our books, our bedding. The property was surrounded by a state forest, which was lovely and natural, but also dark. We had snow on our lawn until April, and then black flies so bad that my children refused to play outside.
I rarely invited people to our home. I was embarrassed– we had so little space, and the space we had seemed so paltry. I remember when my son was four or five and he was invited to a friend’s house for a play date. The friend’s house was a three-story Victorian farmhouse– newly built–with a bonus room over the garage that was dedicated to the kids’ toys. There were shiny wood floors, beautiful Palladian windows, brand new furniture and appliances. I left him there to play and then cried the entire drive home. I would never reciprocate that invitation.
On top of my shame, I felt a crushing sense of loss. I could not provide for my children the comforts I had enjoyed myself as a child. No pool membership, no piano lessons, no vacations to visit the grandparents. The book Opening Our Hearts; Transforming Our Losses, from the Al-Anon Family Groups, describes the many types of loss associated with alcoholism. One of these losses is the loss of dreams for what your life might have been like. Loss of dreams for your children. My childhood/childish dreams of raising a family in a big house with a wide lawn had turned into a nightmare of the realities of alcoholism and poverty. I can never get those years back, to provide my children the life I had wished for them. They are adults now, and they turned out fine, for the most part! But I still grieve from time to time for what I didn’t give them.
My loss was amplified by the fact that we lived in a largely affluent part of the country where the economy is based in tourism. Of course, poverty is difficult to experience in any location. In my case, the stark contrast between my family’s isolated poverty in the midst of great affluence revealed to me the veil that I had been living behind, and that the people around me still were. Growing up in a middle class home, going to a private high school and then on to college– what did I know of poverty other than driving through a neighborhood on my way to somewhere else?
Poverty ripped through that veil and now, like Hester Prynne seeing the scarlet letter where others could not see it, I began to see the veil in front of everyone’s eyes.
On the road where we lived in poverty there were only a handful of other homes, and several of them were owned by people who lived elsewhere and came to our area on weekends and vacations. I would walk with my children in their hand-me-down stroller past beautiful, empty, multi-bedroom homes while my growing family squeezed into 800 square feet. The wealthy tourists who arrived on weekends to occupy those homes and patronize our town’s stores and restaurants lived behind their own veil. Learning that my husband was a fiddle player, one older man said “Have you been to Ireland?” When we answered “No,” he seemed disgusted. “You HAVE to go to Ireland! I just don’t understand people who don’t like to travel,” as if everyone can afford to travel, but some of us just choose not to.
Making friends was difficult once I saw the veil. “Are you signing your daughter up for the children’s chorus?” one potential friend asked. She added “You really should– it’s only $700 a year!” How do I explain that $700 is more than one month’s allotment of public relief? How do I explain that $700 is not “only” $700 to us? I didn’t explain. I just isolated myself.
Even people who should have known better lived behind the veil. A social worker I visited through the public health clinic listened to my tales of poverty and shame and said to me “You can live on less. Maybe you just don’t buy that new winter coat this year.” Did she really think it was that simple? I had been shopping at thrift stores and hadn’t had a new winter coat in 10 years. I was still wearing the L.L. Bean parka my parents bought for me before I moved east.
These years in poverty put a rip in my veil that would only widen, and as difficult as this tearing was, it was one of the greatest gifts of my struggles with poverty. This experience was my awakening to the fact that there are multiple realities around us behind the veil of our own limited perceptions. I now began to see that the things I had taken for granted, the things that many people take for granted, are not givens in life. Money provides options. People without money have fewer options. It was a vivid example of the danger of making assumptions.
Years later, when I was a newly certified English teacher, I took a course on African-American history and literature, and I read for the first time The Souls of Black Folk, by W.E.B. Du Bois. Just three paragraphs into chapter 1, I was thunderstruck.
After the Egyptian and Indian, the Greek and Roman, the Teuton and Mongolian, the Negro is a sort of seventh son, born with a veil, and gifted with second-sight in this American world,– a world which yields him no true self-consciousness, but only lets him see himself through the revelation of the other world. It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever feels his two-ness,– an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, to unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn assunder.
And here was my gift–the realization that others knew of the veil that I had felt tearing apart in my own life. That others felt gifted (and perhaps cursed) with “second-sight” to see the world from two vantage points. I cannot compare my eight-year-long experience of living in poverty with a lifetime of living in the United States as a Black man, but I felt a connection to Du Bois, and I realized that this was one of the many realities going on around me. It was a gift that rewarded me and humbled me simultaneously. Others understood! And yet, I had so much to learn. In my years of poverty, I began unwrapping the gift of seeing beyond the veil.
Further Reading:
The Souls of Black Folk, by W.E.B. Du Bois, has inspired me as a history teacher and as a writer. Du Bois was a genius, without a doubt. His writing is incisive, multi-faceted, and eloquent.
Opening Our Hearts, Transforming Our Losses, Al-Anon Family Groups. This book helped me to see that loss takes many forms and that alcoholic families experience both subtle and obvious losses. Seeing my experiences mirrored in this book and reading about the experiences, strength, and hope of others has brought me serenity in many difficult moments.
The Good Guys
I was a very anxious child. Convinced that our house would catch fire (in the days before smoke alarms were mandatory), I kept the bottom half of the cardboard box that our new refrigerator had been shipped in, and I put my favorite toys in it so that I could drag them to safety in a moment’s notice. Aside from fires, I worried about ghosts and monsters, car accidents, tornadoes, burglars–you name it, I feared it.
My independent and intellectual parents did not know what to do with me. My siblings teased me, and my mother would try, with exasperation, to convince me that there was nothing to fear. One night, when I came to her with some now-long-forgotten fear, she told me something that her father used to tell her: “Nothing bad will happen to us. We’re the good guys.”
I have thought of that statement many times in my adult life. Did she mean that our family followed the rules? Was on the right side of justice? Or that God or some higher power was on our side? It wasn’t true, of course. Bad things did happen to me, and to my siblings. For me, it was not just one or two difficult life events–it was a nearly thirty year stretch of what I jokingly called “learning experiences.” I married when I was young and naive. My 20-year marriage was crippled by poverty, alcoholism, and instability. My husband and I separated, and then he died suddenly and tragically in a car accident. A year later my mother also died suddenly. Another family member struggled with alcoholism and spent a month in rehab. One of my children stopped talking to me for several months. And then, when my life started to balance again, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. It has been a year since my surgery and radiation and my last mammogram was clear. Thank you, modern medicine.
I have just returned from the memorial for my Uncle Mike, my mom’s brother and the last of her surviving siblings. I spoke to Mike occasionally and have many fond memories of him from my childhood. At his memorial I was struck by how privileged he and my mother had been. They had attended private boarding schools and elite colleges like Vassar and Princeton. No wonder my grandfather told my mother that nothing bad would happen to them– they were not the “good guys,” they were just privileged enough to shield themselves from bad things happening. My uncle became a lawyer in New York City and traveled internationally. A friend of his spoke at the memorial and described Mike as an “ardent capitalist” whose views were softened in his sixties or seventies when he delivered Meals on Wheels to senior citizens in Ithaca and realized that many people his age were impoverished, ailing, and homebound.
I am so glad that my uncle had this experience and came to know that there are many realities going on “out there” in the world around us, that his life was not the norm. After the memorial, as I drove through Ithaca and the campus of Cornell University, I wondered at the way we strive so much to provide our children with that sheltered life. Of course, we don’t want our children to suffer. At the same time, I see what a gift it was for me to understand, in my twenties, living in poverty in an unstable and alcoholic marriage, that there were other “realities” than the one I had been raised in. That there were forces beyond an individual’s control that could shape her life. That not everyone was middle-class and well-educated and that not everyone desired to be! This, to me, is the greatest “gift” of struggle, of loss, of grief. Our wounds provide an opening to let humility and empathy in, if we let them in. To see that we are not our circumstances– for good or bad. To respond with gratitude for the smallest of joys. To know that bad things happen to all people– there are no “good guys” who are protected from harm, and those who have struggles do not have them because they are “bad guys.” We are all just human, improvising the best life story we can with plot twists that are often out of our control. We are all doing the best we can.
Further Reading:
One of the books that helped me the most along my journey was When Bad Things Happen to Good People, by Harold Kushner. Notice the title is not WHY bad things happen, but WHEN. Bad things will happen, even to “good” people. I am not religious in the traditional sense of the word, but I found this book to be very comforting and wise.
Tenacious E
You called me “tenacious” and you said that can be good in some situations, but not in the administrative role that I had applied for. This is a political role, you said, and it requires being diplomatic with a wide variety of people. I asked you if you thought I could learn and grow into this role, and you said it was too important a role to take a chance– maybe I would grow some, but if it wasn’t enough I could be damaging to the district.
Tenacious. That word stuck in my mind. I looked it up: Tenacious: (adj.) 1. tending to keep a firm hold of something; clinging or adhering closely. 2. not readily relinquishing a position, principle, or course of action; determined.
It almost makes me laugh. Yes, I am tenacious. I had no choice. I married young, had two children and a step-child by the time I was 28, and lived in poverty for 8 years with an alcoholic husband. By the time I met you, I had been teaching for many years, scraping and clawing my family out of poverty and into the middle class. I had managed to buy a house in our affluent community– a two bedroom house, so my son slept on the living room couch for a few years. All the while, my husband drank excessively in two year cycles. When he was drinking, we were very unstable. I think we talked about divorce 10 times in our 20 year marriage. In spring of 2009, we had been stable for a good year and a half when he learned that he was rapidly losing his hearing. He started drinking again and we started fighting again and finally decided to separate. In May of 2011, he died in a DUI. A year later, my mother died suddenly from COPD. My daughter moved away, and then my son went to college. I found myself middle-aged, alone, and grieving. I had to be tenacious to pull myself out of poverty, survive my grief, and make my life good in spite of loss.
And then, a few years ago, things began to settle and shift. I met the love of my life. My son moved back home after college. met a wonderful young woman, and got engaged. My step-daughter had two beautiful children and we started talking more. I felt like I was healing. I looked back at my life and thought about how much I had suffered and struggled to keep my head above water, and I thought about how much potential I had that was wasted. Maybe I could do more? I worked hard on myself, going to Al-Anon meetings, working the steps, listening to podcasts about Buddhism and how to live with regret and loss. I took classes in leadership. I applied for this new position in our district, the place where I have worked for 24 years.
A week after my interview, I was told that I had breast cancer. I had to wait for surgery because of Covid-19. I had two surgeries, then radiation.
And now you’re telling me that I did not get the job because I’m too “tenacious?”
I try to recall the times you might be referring to. Standing up to teachers who refused to do the work to learn better teaching strategies to use with English language learners? Speaking out when my colleagues were racist or xenophobic? Is that what disqualifies me for this job? Is that the trait that is so ingrained in me that you can’t even trust me to grow and learn as a leader?
Well guess what– I wouldn’t have survived if I were not tenacious. Just as I see my students’ bilingualism and biculturalism as strengths, I see my tenacity as a strength, a huge asset in a difficult life. Some educators call it “grit.” So, fine. I will go to another district, to an urban school where there are LOTS of tenacious people– students and faculty. Black and brown people, economically resourceful people, and English language learners who have tenacity in abundance. I will go where THEY learn and grow, and we will learn and grow together. Because sometimes the medal goes to the runner who goes fast and far, and sometimes the medal goes to the one who clears the most hurdles.
Lessons from Loss #3
The future is not going to be what you thought it would be. Don’t try to predict it. You can’t imagine what it will look like. Fear is not prophecy, and your wishes and daydreams are far less interesting than reality will be. Leave room for surprises– there will be many surprises!!
Lessons from Loss #2
You can be absolutely alone– no spouse, no children, no siblings, no friends–and survive. Go hiking, dance in your living room, watch funny movies, read a book, write a book!– just know that you will be okay. This too shall pass.
Lessons from Loss #1
There’s a great line from the early 2000’s TV show “Six Feet Under” :
“I know that if you think life’s a vending machine where you put in virtue and take out happiness then you’re going to be disappointed.”
Life is also not a vending machine where you put in suffering and are rewarded with something you want. Life’s just not fair, a lot of the time. But it’s still wonderful.
Getting Smart
I didn’t know I was smart until I was in my thirties. I mean, the signs were there. I got straight A’s all through high school without expending much effort. My undergraduate GPA was 3.94. But I didn’t like to read as a child, and in a highly intellectual family like mine was, I was the oddball who preferred doing gymnastics and watching sitcoms over heady discussions of politics and philosophy. It wasn’t until I was teaching high school English and enrolled in graduate school at Trinity College in the American Studies program that I had the first real inkling that I was smart. I took three courses with the same professor– Eugene Leach– who opened up this notion in my mind. Gene told me that I was one of the best writers he had ever encountered in his many years of teaching. I remained skeptical until we had the chance to read papers submitted by previous students and I saw that many of them wrote like my high school students. Okay, I conceded. Maybe I am a good writer. Maybe I am smart.
I spent six years commuting to West Hartford 90 minutes each way, one night a week to complete my MA. The drive never felt like a burden because after class, I was high on the intellectual rigor, discussions, and challenge that Trinity gave me. As I drove, I would sing along with my iPod, belting out songs of triumph and confidence. I devoured my reading assignments and found that I actually could enjoy reading. When I finished my degree, I wanted to go on and complete my PhD in American Studies. I had discovered a strength that my parents had been trying to convince me I had since I was a child. I was just starting to believe they were right.
I was in my mid-thirties, married, with three children at home and a full-time teaching job. Getting my PhD would have involved more driving, perhaps giving up my teaching job to go to school full time, more sacrifice. But I was willing to do that. My husband, on the other hand, was not. We had a strained marriage as it was. We had struggled with poverty before we both started teaching. My husband had issues with alcohol and pot, and he was finding the stress of our careers and graduate school to be more than he could handle. I knew other couples who made it all work– moved to a university town, got by on very little money, and followed their dreams. I didn’t understand why we couldn’t try it, but he said no, firmly, unequivocally. It was my PhD dream or our marriage, basically. I chose our marriage.
We dug into our jobs, bought a house, and saved money to help our kids with college. And then in 2009 it all started to unravel. He was losing his hearing and became depressed. His drinking got even more intense. He told me he wasn’t happy and never had been. I couldn’t take the conflict anymore and we separated. In 2011, while we were working out the details of our divorce, he died in a DUI. My life spiraled out of my control, and I scrambled to hold together my kids and myself as we grieved. I helped them go to college as best I could. A year and a half later, my mom died unexpectedly. I felt like I had a permanent case of the flu for five years. And just as I felt myself coming out of that flu, my daughter hit bottom and went into rehab for her own alcohol and drug addictions. Without a second thought, I paid for the rehab using my home equity line of credit, my credit card, and a gift from my dad.
All these years, I still wondered if I could have done a PhD. I still envied professors and the opportunities that I imagined they had. I watched my brother-in-law and his family as they traveled the world for his research and lectures. Attending conferences, writing papers, giving presentations, teaching a bit– it looked so important, so intellectual and worldly. Now in my early 50’s, I wondered if I could still make it happen. On Facebook and Google News, stories popped up about people later in life pursuing an advanced degree. Why couldn’t I, too? I applied. I was accepted. I started taking classes and, once again, commuting 90 minutes each way to school.
But this time was different. I didn’t leave my classes feeling high. I felt drained. I felt depressed. I had trouble staying awake on the way home. The drive felt scary, dangerous. The work seemed tedious, not inspiring. It felt like a “game” to get published, drop names, and disagree with classmates just for the sake of disagreeing. In the middle of my third course, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. It’s not a horrible type of cancer– I tell people “I have a little bit of breast cancer” because it’s just a tumor that needs to be removed. I’ll have a “lumpectomy” and radiation and I will be fine. But suddenly, everything is in sharp focus. Is this PhD really what I want to be doing with my time? No, it is not. Am I smart? Of course. I even went to a psychologist and had an IQ test, and, yes, I am very smart. I may not be in the 1% financially, but at least I am in the 1% of something. I’m ridiculously smart.
But you know what? You don’t have to be THAT smart to get a PhD. My classmates are plenty smart, but they are also many other things. They are motivated. Most of them live and work near the university. They have jobs that allow them to go to school full time, or they are doing the grad student game of getting fellowships, assistant teaching positions, and loans. They are good at putting up with the BS that comes with grad school– the name dropping, the game playing. Some of them have spouses who support them.
I used to feel like I had been deprived of my PhD. My alcoholic husband held me back. But writing this has made me reframe this story. I chose my family. I chose financial stability. Those were good choices. The harder part to reframe is the lack of control. I was not able to corral my life into the lanes that I wanted it to go into. I was powerless over my husband’s drinking, I was powerless over my mom’s smoking. I am powerless over my daughter’s life, and I am powerless over my cancer. There’s a famous quote from Gilda Radner that says “Life is about not knowing, having to change, taking the moment and making the best of it, without knowing what’s going to happen next.” I’ve always wanted to make my life into the life I wanted it to be, but I’m slowly admitting that, at least for me, life doesn’t work that way. It’s improv, not script. It’s Iron Chef and there are lots of “secret ingredients” that you have to work with. It’s playing the hand you were dealt, not choosing the best hand. It still seems like other people get to choose their hand, get to mold their life the way they want it to be. Maybe they do. Maybe no one does. Maybe I’m comparing my inside to their outside. Maybe it’s just me. But ultimately, I just need to do me. Play the hand I have been dealt and play it the best way I can. That would be the smart thing to do.
Love Your Enemies
I recently finished the book Love Your Enemies, by Arthur C. Brooks. I found the book to be challenging in places– which is perfect because it ties in with one of the points Brooks is trying to make. We can listen to each other’s reasoned arguments–even when we disagree– with an open heart, without shutting down or demonizing the person we disagree with. Brooks’s argument throughout is heartfelt and open. I did not feel insulted or demonized by what he was saying, I just disagreed with some of his conclusions. Still, I am glad I stuck with the book to the end because his overall thesis is an extremely important one in today’s political climate.
The introduction grabbed me immediately, in a positive way. Brooks talks about the “culture of contempt” that we are currently experiencing and warns us not to be manipulated by the “outrage industrial complex.” I love that phrase, modified from Eisenhower’s military industrial complex, and I see the way social media and cable news are acting as the “dealers” for our addiction to contempt. All good. We’re on the same page here. Early chapters draw on social psychology research and the words of the Dalai Lama to discuss the harmful effects of contempt itself and the magical effects of warmheartedness. Brooks refutes the common belief that “nice guys finish last,” in romance and in the workplace — a noble and necessary refutation. He examines the phenomenon that draws some people to coercive leaders and explains why coercive leaders are dangerous. As a long-time fan of Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundation theory, much of this discussion was repetitive for me. If you are not aware of Haidt’s work, Brooks’s description is a good introduction to it. One of my favorite suggestions from these early chapters is to look for the “why” that we have in common rather than focusing on the “how.” Brooks implies that we all– liberals and conservatives and everyone in between– share common love for our country and belief in ideas like justice, equality, and freedom. Those are the “why” ideas. The “how” is policy, and we disagree on that. How to achieve justice or greater economic equality can be tricky. He wants us to discuss the “how” after we have acknowledged that we share the “why” in common. That’s a good suggestion and one I hope I can remember in the heat of a discussion.
Throughout the book, however, I had moments of “Eh….” when Brooks’ argument just didn’t ring true for me. For example, he shares a story about Howard Thurston, a turn-of-the-century stage musician from Ohio. It is the typical “pulled himself up by his bootstraps” story with the added twist of Thurston’s use of kindness and love for his audience as an explanation for his success. Lovely story, and I’m a big fan of love and kindness, but aren’t there other factors that explain Thurston’s success? Or at least explain the lack of obstacles in Thurston’s way? Like the fact that he was a white man who was allowed into any space he chose to venture into? Brooks similarly explains the success of the marriage equality act as stemming from the humanization of LGBTQ people in the eyes of neighbors and friends. By showing their humanity in asking for the right to marry “just like everyone else,” LGBTQ activists were, according to Brooks, able to overcome the resistance many people felt toward marriage equality. I’ve heard this argument before and it bothers me because it smacks of self-congratulatory smugness. It implies that LGBTQ activists had some moral secret figured out that other movements have lacked. I have yet to hear the argument that white men and women could rise to positions of power and influence in their communities and in the nation at large without anyone realizing they were gay, lesbian, queer, etc. How does a Black man in America show his “humanness” to people who automatically reject him based on the color of his skin? White LGBTQ activists still retained all the privilege of being white– the economic, educational, and legislative powers that all white Americans enjoy– because their LGTBQ identities were not obvious on the surface. Different challenges exist for other marginalized groups whose identities are immediately apparent and who suffer from generations of discrimination and systemic oppression. Showing people your humanity is not always as easy as it sounds.
Another weak spot for me was when Brooks explains the rise of populism in the 2016 election not as an economic issue caused by job loss and low wages, but as an issue of “dignity.” He argues against raising the minimum wage because it will, according to his research data, cause job loss instead of a better standard of living and in turn will not lead to “dignity” for working people. Again, I understand the need for dignity for all people, but I wonder how much real-world experience Brooks has dealing with issues of poverty and discrimination. He too easily takes on the assumption that what stands in the way of people pulling themselves out of poverty is a resistance to work, that we need to insist that poor people work so that they can feel the dignity of supporting themselves, as if poverty is caused by a character flaw instead of major systemic economic and social issues. Does Brooks know many poor people? People on public assistance? He admits that he is an academic– he says he took on a job as a fund-raiser with a strong knowledge of the data around charity giving but no real-world experience with the raising of funds. As a former recipient of public assistance, I find the assumption that poor people just need to experience the dignity of work to “wake up” their self-sufficiency to be simplistic and patronizing.
Chapter 5 is where I struggled the most to continue listening. Here Brooks discusses identity and the dangers of focusing too much on “identity politics.” He never names specific groups that fall into this trap, and I was left to wonder if he meant groups like “Black Lives Matter,” which is often accused of playing “identity politics.” Again, I felt like his argument was naive. I get his point– too much focus on identity without a balance of unity can be destructive. But whenever people suggest leaving identity issues in the background to focus on what binds us together as people, it sounds like a suggestion to support the status quo and stop agitating for change. Does Brooks understand that “identity politics” is not about identity for the sake of identity, but instead is about power, privilege, equality, and justice? I was left thinking that he doesn’t fully understand what is needed for marginalized people to challenge the status quo.
Later, in Chapter 7, Brooks focuses on the merits of competition– the tried and true “yin” in conservative arguments that seems to never be balanced out by the “yang” of human survival– compassionate cooperation. This chapter starts with a bemoaning of the elimination of dodge-ball from many public school gym classes, a sign in Brooks’s mind that we have become too “soft” and have stopped valuing competition. Seriously? Anyone who has spent any time at all in a public school knows that competition is alive and well. Sports reign supreme at most high schools in America, and if you’re not a star on the soccer field, you have your GPA, your STEM competitions, your poetry recitation competition, your all-state chorus and band competition–the list goes on and on–to prove your strengths. Dodge-ball is a horrific experience for 90% of the students in a gym class who get hit with a ball early in the game and then spend the rest of the gym class sitting on the side lines. How is that teaching them physical fitness? Imagine if we taught reading by such a contest of strengths. “Oops, you can’t read! Well, just sit over there on the wall of shame and watch THESE guys read. That’ll help you!” Eliminating dodge-ball is a smart move pedagogically. There are FAR better ways to encourage physical fitness for all– and especially for those who need it most– than by this archaic game. If you choose to have a dodge-ball game for those who WANT to play it, go ahead. But it does not accomplish the goals of physical education for most of the students.
These arguments, spread throughout the book–for pulling oneself up by one’s bootstraps, for the dignity of work and the merits of competition–are boilerplate conservative economic arguments. They have always left me feeling that conservative economists lack a true understanding of the world outside of their academic and personal experiences. On the plus side, Brooks presents these arguments with clear warmheartedness; there was no contempt or insult to people who might disagree. I gave myself the goal of listening simply to understand his points, with my own heart as open as I could make it. Luckily my frustration was lessened by the final chapters of the book. Here Brooks asks us to please continue to disagree with one another, but to disagree with kindness rather than contempt. This is a large ask in this era of social media trolls, cable news panel smackdowns, and YouTube videos that announce “Watch as (insert name of cable news host) DESTROYS (insert name of guest).” He ends with a list of concrete suggestions for how to wean ourselves from the culture of contempt. Refuse to be used by the powerful who ask you to hate people different from yourself.. Don’t watch so much news. Spend limited time on social media. Speak up when friends express contempt for people who hold different views. Put yourself into situations where your views are in the minority. Focus on the “why” questions that we all agree on. Apologize to those you have offended. In the end, aren’t these actions all of us could benefit from?
Clapback #1
As the vote to confirm Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh draws closer, protestors have been swarming Washington D.C. to talk to their senators and speak up for sexual assault survivors everywhere.
In one recent video, protestors can be seen approaching Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch inside the Hart Senate Office Building. As Hatch walks to an elevator, one woman says, “Why aren’t you brave enough to talk to us and exchange with us?”
As they continue to talk to him, Hatch steps into the elevator and says, “When you grow up I’ll be glad to.”– (https://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/a23609550/republican-sen-orrin-hatch-protestors-grow-up/)
Okay, here’s the thing. Senator Hatch, you are 84 years old. You’re retiring at the end of this term, thank Goddess. So, yeah, the protestors who approached you were definitely younger than you. But they are grown women. They are adults. They have a perspective that is different from yours, sir. They have had experiences that are different from yours. And you didn’t want to hear about those experiences because it conflicted with and threatened your political power.
Women hear this kind of admonition all the time. Grow up. Stop being so emotional. Think about it logically. You have a problem! You need to get help!
Meanwhile, a white man can sit for a job interview in which he cries, yells, talks about his love for beer, and shares details from his raunchy yearbook entry and he is elevated to the highest court in the land. Another man can mock people, brag about sexual assault, and lie constantly and he is supported by men like you in his position as the “leader” of this country. Maybe THEY need to grow up?
We’re done. We’ve been gaslighted enough. We don’t lack age. We don’t lack maturity. We lack power. But rest assured Mr. Hatch, a change gonna come.
We Hear You, Trust Me.
“From Maude to Murphy Brown, I Am Woman to All About that Bass, we’ve been lectured about women’s issues….I’ve listened. And I’ve treated women with respect and empathy my whole life. But I want the same. And I think, deep down, so do most men.”
“I know I need to listen to People of Color to learn their perspective, just like they need to listen to me to learn about the white male perspective.”
These are two comments I have heard or read recently in discussions about women’s issues and racism in my community. Look, guys, I know this is a difficult time for you. I mean, #metoo is really scary, almost as scary as being raped. But here’s the thing: we listen to you ALL THE TIME. You just don’t realize it because it’s the water we’re swimming in every day, 24-7. When you say “women/POC need to listen to US” this is what happens in my brain:
Socrates, Aristotle, Homer, Odysseus, Achilles, Agamemnon, William Shakespeare, Falstaff, Henry V, King Lear, Macbeth, Hamlet, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Herman Melville, Edgar Allan Poe, James Fennimore Cooper, Hawkeye, Charles Dickens, Pip, Walt Whitman, Mark Twain, Tom Sawyer, Huckleberry Finn, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Jay Gatsby, Tom Buchanan, William Faulkner, Thomas Sutpen, Ernest Hemingway, Frederic Henry and every other Hemingway protagonist, Arthur Miller, John Proctor, Willy Loman, Biff, J.D. Salinger, Holden Caulfield, Atticus Finch, Kurt Vonnegut, Vladimir Nabakov, Humbert Humbert, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Rodion Raskalnikov, Ray Bradbury, David Sedaris, Raymond Carver, John Updike, Harry Angstrom, William Golding, Jack, Ralph, Piggy, Simon, John Irving, Owen Meany, John Wheelwright, Jack Kerouac, Dean Moriarty, Carlo Marx, Cormac McCarthy, and Tim O’Brien…
Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Lawrence Kohlberg, Erik Erikson, Carl Jung, Jean Piaget, Ivan Pavlov, William Wundt, Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, Harry Harlow, Steven Pinker, Jonathan Haidt….
Friedrich Nietzche, Immanuel Kant, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, David Hume, Jean-Paul Sartre, Karl Marx, Thomas Hobbes, Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Waldo Emerson….
George Carlin, Steve Martin, Robin Williams, Louis C.K., Jerry Seinfeld, Rodney Dangerfield, Woody Allen, Patton Oswalt, Will Ferrell, Chevy Chase, John Belushi, John Candy, Dan Ackroyd, Bill Murray, Bob Hope, Dane Cook…..
Johnny Carson, David Letterman, Jay Leno, Conan O’Brien, Jon Stewart, Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Stephen Colbert, Seth Meyer, James Corden, Bill Maher, John Oliver, Trevor Noah….
Archie Bunker, Bob Newhart, Hawkeye Pierce and B.J. Hunnicut, Frank Burns, Charles Emerson Winchester the third, Felix Ungar, Oscar Madison, Hogan’s Heroes, Marcus Welby, John Cleese, Eric Idle, Colombo, Richie Cunningham, The Fonz, Captain Kirk, Scotty, Spock, Homer Simpson, Peter Griffin, Matt Stone, Trey Parker….
Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Indiana Jones, George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, Martin Scorcese, Quentin Tarentino…..
Tom Brokaw, Walter Cronkite, Dan Rather, Jake Tapper, Bill O’Reilly, Tucker Carlson, Brian Williams, Matt Lauer, Anderson Cooper…
Thomas Edison, Albert Einstein, Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs…
Bruce Springsteen, Billy Joel, Elton John, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, Ringo Starr, George Harrison, Mick Jagger, Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton….
And then there’s George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, John F. Kennedy, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John McCain, George W. Bush, Donald J. Trump, Mitch McConnell, Lindsay Graham, Orin Hatch, Dick Durbin, John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Brett Kavanaugh, and on and on and on….
We’ve heard you, trust me…..we’ve HEARD you. You have told YOUR stories through our literature, our laws, our history, our art, our music for three hundred years. We have needed to hear you in order to survive in this world. You have not needed to hear us. Yet. So when you say “women/POC need to listen to US,” we may roll our eyes. Please. Pass the mic. It’s time to listen to US.

Recent Comments