Archive | April 2017

A Son By Any Other Name…

Choosing names for our children was– like so much of our marriage–a struggle.  Looking back, some of the memories make me laugh.  When I became pregnant for the first time, my husband and I were wanna-be hippies planning a home birth.  We toyed with names like “River” for a boy, and “Honesty” or “Cadence” for a girl.  My mother went apoplectic when she heard “River” and told us we should name the baby “Oliver” if it was a boy and “Olga” if it was a girl.  Since our last name started with O, the child’s initials would have been “OO” which she thought was hysterical.  Anson and I agreed to never discuss the topic with her again.

But that was about all we could agree on.  As soon as I found out I was pregnant, I had a rush of insterest in family history.  I loved the name Margaret which was my grandmother’s name.  She represented the Irish-Catholic side of my heritage and her intense love of family was one of the traits I admired about her.  I suggested naming the child Margaret and calling her Maggie.  Anson didn’t like that idea, saying “If we’re going to call her Maggie, let’s just name her Maggie.”  But I wanted to honor my grandmother who went by Margaret all her life.  So I stupidly put away the name “Maggie.”  I also had a beloved great-aunt, Kitty, who had spunk and energy and humor– her full name was Katharine, and I had always loved the name Katie for a girl.  Again, “If w’ere going to call her Katie, let’s just name her Katie.”  We ended up naming her Kate Elizabeth, and even so, we called her Katie. (Isn’t that the same as naming her Katherine and calling her Katie?)  I wish now that I had pushed harder for my choices– but I was young, insecure, and didn’t want to fight about it.

With my second pregnancy, I looked through my family tree and scrapbooks my older relatives sent me.   One of the richest stories about my own family came from a couple– Daniel and Katherine Heffernan– who moved to Indiana from Ireland in the 1800’s.  I loved the name Daniel– it reminded me of the gentle Daniel Tiger on Mr. Roger’s Neighborhood and the song by Elton John.  My grandmother Margaret had a brother named Daniel and the name Danny to me sounded confident and dashing.  Anson rejected Danny because he had been bullied by a boy named Danny as a kid.  Again, I didn’t want to fight, and I let Danny go.

I think it’s important to mention that I was surrounded by his family.  We actually lived next door to his parents, and his sister and her family were 15 minutes away.  My family was spread out all over the country– New Mexico, Florida, Georgia and Indiana.  We were dirt poor, and travel is expensive.  When I asked to spend more time with my family, my husband said he didn’t enjoy being around my family.  His mother literally said to me once “Yes, but….our family is better.”  So I guess I didn’t feel like I could win in these discussions.  There was so much psychic support behind him and his preferences, and so little behind mine, I felt.  So I turned to his family history.

In my husband’s family tree, I noticed that there had been someone named Anson Jonathan in every century.  It started with a Nathan, who named his son Jonathan, who named his son Anson Jonathan in the 1700’s.  There was an Anson Jonathan in every century after, although Anson, my husband, did not have the middle name Jonathan.  I was in the midst of my American Studies degree and I had just learned that, in the 1700’s, John was the stereotypical name used for a British citizen (as in John Q. Public) and Jonathan was the stereotypical American name.  So Jonathan, for me, represented American culture, and it reminded me of apples and apple trees, which are connected to my father in my mind.  So we agreed on Anson Jonathan.  Neither of us wanted to use “big Anson” and “little Anson,” or “Anson, senior” and “Anson, junior.”  We toyed with Andy and A.J., but we finally settled on calling him Jonathan, which I came to love.

Still, my son’s legal name is Anson Jonathan, and when he transferred schools in the seventh grade, his teachers called him Anson.  He never corrected them, whether out of shyness or preference I’m not sure.  But here and there, people started calling him Anson to my surprise.  When he and his dad started working together at a ski area, my then fourteen year-old son had a badge that said “Jonathan.”  The next year, he asked for “Jon” on his badge.  And the next year, it was “Janson.”  Then his dad, Anson, died.

Jonathan started community college and introduced himself as Anson from the start.  He told his cousins and other relatives to start calling him Anson.  I remember when he officially “came out” to them as Anson and the discussion we had later, just the two of us.  I explained to him the family history I had wanted to preserve and the way his dad had rejected my ideas for baby names.  I told him about how hard it would be for me to call him by his dad’s name– for many reasons.  His dad was an alcoholic, our marriage was difficult from day one.   We had been separated when he died and his behavior had been erratic and hurtful.  He died in a car accident– suddenly, tragically, unnecessarily.  I know my son loved his dad and misses him terribly.  But I just can’t bring myself to call him by that name.

I don’t know what to do with all this.  I still call my son Jonathan, or J.  He says he’s fine with it.  His cousins and aunts and uncles on his dad’s side call him Anson.  I’m sure it brings them comfort and pride.  My siblings and their children, who he rarely sees, call him Jonathan.  This morning, my brother saw a post on Facebook and aksed me why my son was using the name Anson.  And here it is all back again–what struggles are worth arguing over?  What can we bend on?  Now it is his name, his identity.  I absolutely respect that.  But what if I just can’t call him by that name?

Husband Stealer

I have a vivid memory from the year right after Anson died.  I was returning home from a trip, riding in the airport shuttle back to long-term parking.  The man next to me was leafing through a folder of papers with the Duke University logo at the top.  My brother-in-law had recently started teaching at Duke, so I asked my seat mate if he worked there.  “No,” he said, “I’m writing a proposal for them for my business.  We moved down to Durham a few years ago.  We really like it, my whole family.  We had been in New England for years, and it’s nice and warm down there.”

After a few pleasantries, our conversation ended–typical traveler talk.  But what struck me and stays with me was the repetition of “we” so clearly and almost awkwardly.  It’s a conversation I think of often as I try to decipher the responses of men I interact with.  It’s as if, when a man sees a woman without a wedding ring, alarm bells go off and they become deer in the headlights.

In one of my favorite documentaries, “The Science of Sex Appeal,” psychologist Martie Haselton refers to studies showing that men tend to overestimate women’s interest in them, unconsciously trying to avoid a missed mating opportunity.   Understanding this evoltionary tendency is all well and good intellectually, but the real-time effect of this behavior is…..bewildering, at best, and downright hurtful at worst.

On the bewildering side, there is the young man who posted a picture of a cougar on his Facebook news feed after I complimented his sense of humor.  Seriously?  Did he honestly think that one compliment was a sign of my desire to ravage him with my deadly claws?

On the hurtful side, there is just the unending feeling of loneliness that comes from striking up a conversation with an adult male and having the “we” shield thrown up immediately.   Or the completely out of context comments about how lucky they are to be married to such a wonderful woman.  Then there is the response of women, who seem to think that any conversation with their husband is a sign that I’m going to break apart their marriage.  I am not that woman.  Why do I need to say that so often?  There are men out there who want to cheat– trust me, I’ve met my fair share.  I wish all of the married men who have propositioned me could testify publically to my refusal to be that woman.

Widows are human, and as humans, we need social contact.  We need to talk to people– male and female.  We also need to know we are still attractive.  And we are capable of limiting it to just that– just the acknowledgement that we are still interesting to other people.  Relax, ladies and gentlemen.  I’m not a husband stealer.